WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
Style:
::cue(c.cyan) { color: cyan; }
::cue(c.yellow) { color: yellow; }
##

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:02.931
This is a story about
a television title sequence,

2
00:00:02.931 --> 00:00:05.448
and about me,
as a child watching it.

3
00:00:05.448 --> 00:00:08.294
It's also a warning about
how YouTube won't last forever,

4
00:00:08.294 --> 00:00:11.607
and it's the reason
I'm climbing this particular hill.

5
00:00:15.493 --> 00:00:18.405
<i>It'll Be Alright on the Night</i>
was an outtakes show.

6
00:00:18.405 --> 00:00:21.823
It compiled mistakes, technical errors,
and flubs from television and film...

7
00:00:21.823 --> 00:00:25.162
what its presenter and writer,
Denis Norden, termed "cockups".

8
00:00:25.162 --> 00:00:29.225
When the first episode aired in 1977,
it was the only television show anywhere

9
00:00:29.225 --> 00:00:32.360
that was dedicated to showing clips
that the public weren't meant to see.

10
00:00:32.360 --> 00:00:35.454
The show's formula was simple:
compilations of cockups

11
00:00:35.454 --> 00:00:39.380
presented by Denis Norden, clipboard in hand,
to a live studio audience.

12
00:00:39.380 --> 00:00:41.955
He'd add some wry comments
around each set of outtakes,

13
00:00:41.955 --> 00:00:44.380
his delivery slow and measured and droll.

14
00:00:44.380 --> 00:00:48.973
He chose the clips and wrote the script himself —
he'd been an accomplished comedy writer for decades.

15
00:00:48.973 --> 00:00:52.566
In that first show, he has to explain
the concept of the outtake,

16
00:00:52.566 --> 00:00:55.779
of how they've picked up the no-good — NG — takes
off the cutting room floor,

17
00:00:55.779 --> 00:00:57.910
either literally or metaphorically.

18
00:00:57.910 --> 00:01:02.549
<c.yellow>And it's around some of the choicer
of these NG takes we've found

19
00:01:02.549 --> 00:01:05.741
<c.yellow>that this programme has been nailed together.

20
00:01:05.741 --> 00:01:10.091
In truth, those clips had been quietly circulating
among film and television technicians for a while:

21
00:01:10.091 --> 00:01:13.832
they'd save the best ones and compile them together
to show at the office Christmas party.

22
00:01:13.832 --> 00:01:17.400
Occasionally, a comedy show might put
its own outtakes in somewhere,

23
00:01:17.400 --> 00:01:20.415
but the idea of compiling them together
as a show in itself

24
00:01:20.415 --> 00:01:24.348
and displaying other people's mistakes
to the public: well, that was new.

25
00:01:24.348 --> 00:01:29.103
In that first 1977 show, even the simplest,
most basic mistakes get a laugh,

26
00:01:29.103 --> 00:01:31.933
partly because they're being shown
to a warmed-up live audience,

27
00:01:31.933 --> 00:01:35.826
but partly because things like that
had not been seen by the public before.

28
00:01:35.826 --> 00:01:42.549
And I know that's weird from a 21st-century perspective,
but seeing a film actor forget their lines was novel.

29
00:01:42.549 --> 00:01:45.799
Now, that was a one-off programme,
so it had a one-off title sequence.

30
00:01:45.799 --> 00:01:47.652
And those titles are slow by modern standards.

31
00:01:47.652 --> 00:01:50.864
It's literally just someone using
dry transfer letters to create the title,

32
00:01:50.864 --> 00:01:53.202
and making obvious pre-planned mistakes.

33
00:01:53.202 --> 00:01:54.913
It's more than a minute long.

34
00:01:54.913 --> 00:01:57.080
But it gets a couple of laughs,
it sets the tone,

35
00:01:57.080 --> 00:02:00.890
and it's exactly the sort of thing you'd expect
for a show of that era and that budget.

36
00:02:00.890 --> 00:02:03.765
<i>Alright On The Night</i> was an obvious success.

37
00:02:03.765 --> 00:02:06.122
But there weren't enough available outtakes
to make it a regular thing.

38
00:02:06.122 --> 00:02:08.495
It returned for a second edition
two years later,

39
00:02:08.495 --> 00:02:13.092
concentrating more on mistakes from film,
with a title sequence built as a fake movie trailer.

40
00:02:13.092 --> 00:02:16.989
And the third edition, 1981, had to focus
a lot on American outtakes,

41
00:02:16.989 --> 00:02:19.580
partly because the UK had started
to run out of material,

42
00:02:19.580 --> 00:02:22.122
but partly because America
now had a similar show,

43
00:02:22.122 --> 00:02:25.427
and the two countries' productions
were sharing tapes across the Atlantic.

44
00:02:25.427 --> 00:02:29.636
You can see the UK team set the audience's
expectations in their title sequence.

45
00:02:29.636 --> 00:02:34.687
And it's, again, a pretty standard set of titles
for a one-off show: some commissioned animation.

46
00:02:34.687 --> 00:02:38.622
But as the '80s went on, <i>Alright On The Night</i>
became more and more popular.

47
00:02:38.622 --> 00:02:43.417
When a new show aired, which was only
every two years or so, it was event television.

48
00:02:43.417 --> 00:02:47.237
There was even one late-night, more-adult edition
on the new, edgy Channel 4,

49
00:02:47.237 --> 00:02:52.111
and one sports edition called <i>It'll Be Alright on the Day1</i>,
which as far as I can tell is entirely lost to history.

50
00:02:52.111 --> 00:02:56.486
Now, the only source that I have for ratings is Wikipedia,
which doesn't have its sources cited.

51
00:02:56.486 --> 00:02:59.208
I don't have any explicit reason
to doubt those numbers,

52
00:02:59.208 --> 00:03:02.612
but also, I can absolutely imagine some jerk
emailing me after this video

53
00:03:02.612 --> 00:03:06.476
gloating that I believed the fake viewing figures
they hilariously added years ago.

54
00:03:06.476 --> 00:03:10.592
But, the numbers do seem reasonable,
so assuming they're true:

55
00:03:10.592 --> 00:03:14.596
by the late '80s, the show was pulling in
17 million viewers.

56
00:03:14.596 --> 00:03:18.000
That means about a third of the entire
British population were tuned in.

57
00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:20.470
After all, there were only four television channels.

58
00:03:20.470 --> 00:03:21.963
By the early 90s,

59
00:03:21.963 --> 00:03:25.615
<i>Alright On The Night</i> was an institution
on ITV, the main commercial network.

60
00:03:25.615 --> 00:03:28.749
Their publicly-funded rivals at the BBC
launched a competing show,

61
00:03:28.749 --> 00:03:30.944
raiding their own archives
and Christmas tapes,

62
00:03:30.944 --> 00:03:33.736
but they were always playing second fiddle.

63
00:03:33.736 --> 00:03:38.742
<i>Alright On The Night</i> was a show that belonged to
that massively centralised era of television.

64
00:03:38.742 --> 00:03:40.815
Big, monolithic studio complexes

65
00:03:40.815 --> 00:03:43.311
where half a dozen shows might be
recorded at the same time:

66
00:03:43.311 --> 00:03:47.566
a comedy in one studio, a drama next door,
light entertainment just down the hall.

67
00:03:47.566 --> 00:03:52.629
And each studio complex would have
a central VT Department — VT for "video tape".

68
00:03:52.629 --> 00:03:55.612
Back then, television cameras didn't do
the actual recording to tape themselves,

69
00:03:55.612 --> 00:03:58.921
they just sent live signals
down the cables to VT,

70
00:03:58.921 --> 00:04:02.480
who were usually stuck in a windowless
basement room with big specialised equipment.

71
00:04:02.480 --> 00:04:05.617
So the folks in VT would do
the actual recording,

72
00:04:05.617 --> 00:04:08.176
and they'd see pretty much
everything that was going on.

73
00:04:08.176 --> 00:04:10.973
And by the '90s, those VT engineers,
and the editors putting the footage together:

74
00:04:10.973 --> 00:04:13.715
oh, they all knew about the outtake shows.

75
00:04:13.715 --> 00:04:16.822
So if an actor slipped up and
happened to make the folks in VT laugh,

76
00:04:16.822 --> 00:04:19.977
it wasn't just "huh, maybe that clip'll end up
in the Christmas tape".

77
00:04:19.977 --> 00:04:22.044
It was, to quote actor Rik Mayall...

78
00:04:26.132 --> 00:04:28.132
...which is a great line,
well delivered,

79
00:04:28.132 --> 00:04:30.313
but also not quite as improvised as it seems.

80
00:04:30.313 --> 00:04:33.435
He said that several different ways
over the years after various slipups,

81
00:04:33.435 --> 00:04:36.432
because it could reliably get a laugh
from a British audience.

82
00:04:36.432 --> 00:04:39.643
<i>Alright on the Night</i>
was part of British culture.

83
00:04:39.643 --> 00:04:41.335
And as it went on through the '90s,

84
00:04:41.335 --> 00:04:43.664
the title sequences were always
specially-commissioned,

85
00:04:43.664 --> 00:04:45.175
because they had to be.

86
00:04:45.175 --> 00:04:47.461
Each show was numbered,
and that number would often appear 

87
00:04:47.461 --> 00:04:50.166
throughout the show's artwork
or as part of the set design.

88
00:04:50.166 --> 00:04:52.986
The budget did seem to
stretch and shift a bit:

89
00:04:52.986 --> 00:04:55.656
Sometimes there would be an
elaborate animated title sequence

90
00:04:55.656 --> 00:04:58.793
and a live studio audience very clearly in shot.

91
00:04:58.793 --> 00:05:01.157
Sometimes there'd just be
a quick bit of computer graphics

92
00:05:01.157 --> 00:05:03.259
and no audience actually visible.

93
00:05:03.259 --> 00:05:05.220
I'm not saying they used canned laughter.

94
00:05:05.221 --> 00:05:08.087
I don't have access to the paperwork
and records that'd prove it either way,

95
00:05:08.087 --> 00:05:10.957
but I am saying that for
studio entertainment shows,

96
00:05:10.957 --> 00:05:13.695
TV directors very much like to show off

97
00:05:13.695 --> 00:05:16.710
and prove there's a live audience...
if they can.

98
00:05:16.710 --> 00:05:18.359
But, the show had settled down,

99
00:05:18.359 --> 00:05:21.855
as much as a show can settle down when it
only has a new episode every two or three years.

100
00:05:21.855 --> 00:05:23.885
It finally got a consistent theme tune.

101
00:05:23.885 --> 00:05:25.808
Instead of a different stock library piece every time,

102
00:05:25.808 --> 00:05:30.586
it became a specially-composed, saxophone-heavy
and very, very '90s bit of music.

103
00:05:30.586 --> 00:05:33.159
And that's where you'd expect the show to stay.

104
00:05:33.159 --> 00:05:36.864
Title sequence, regular theme tune,
studio section, outtakes.

105
00:05:36.864 --> 00:05:40.004
You'd expect it to become a stock-standard show
with stock-standard production.

106
00:05:40.004 --> 00:05:43.113
Yes, it's popular. Yes, it takes
a lot of research and clearance —

107
00:05:43.113 --> 00:05:46.632
particularly because the show not only
needed permission to show clips,

108
00:05:46.632 --> 00:05:50.106
but also paid a fee to the performers
as thank-you.

109
00:05:50.106 --> 00:05:53.072
But it's a regular studio show,
in a routine.

110
00:05:53.072 --> 00:05:57.029
You'd expect the titles and production
to be... just okay, fine.

111
00:05:57.733 --> 00:06:00.299
But they're a lot more than that:
as the show goes through the 90s,

112
00:06:00.299 --> 00:06:03.714
you start to see some really clever bits
of compositing and technical work.

113
00:06:03.714 --> 00:06:07.440
Look at this transition from the titles of
the seventh edition, January '93:

114
00:06:07.440 --> 00:06:11.558
Completely CG introduction, there's a red circle,
the film reel morphing into a number seven.

115
00:06:11.558 --> 00:06:14.748
All CG, completely CG text over it.

116
00:06:14.748 --> 00:06:19.417
But seamlessly, it becomes
a live camera shot of the actual studio set.

117
00:06:19.417 --> 00:06:22.127
Now, if you look closely,
you can see there's a fade just there,

118
00:06:22.127 --> 00:06:23.763
they've used a looped few seconds of footage,

119
00:06:23.763 --> 00:06:26.401
but I have gone frame-by-frame
through that title,

120
00:06:26.401 --> 00:06:29.693
and I am not certain where
the transition from CG to real set is.

121
00:06:29.693 --> 00:06:31.106
It's brilliant work.

122
00:06:31.106 --> 00:06:33.650
And importantly, it meant
there was probably coordination

123
00:06:33.650 --> 00:06:36.918
between the title designers and the set designers
and the director and the camera team.

124
00:06:36.918 --> 00:06:40.262
That'll be a huge amount of effort
for a production team nowadays,

125
00:06:40.262 --> 00:06:42.625
let alone one using tech from
nearly 30 years ago.

126
00:06:42.625 --> 00:06:44.062
They didn't have to do that.

127
00:06:44.062 --> 00:06:45.607
No-one was going to think
less of the show

128
00:06:45.607 --> 00:06:48.153
if they'd just had a regular title sequence
and then cut to the set.

129
00:06:48.162 --> 00:06:53.484
Who does that? Who bothers to do
that much for a clip show of outtakes?

130
00:06:53.484 --> 00:06:56.766
Well, some people who are clearly
very dedicated to their craft.

131
00:06:56.766 --> 00:06:59.471
It's similar with the eighth edition:
it's not quite as smooth,

132
00:06:59.471 --> 00:07:03.784
but there's still a nice transition between titles
and set and live studio audience.

133
00:07:03.784 --> 00:07:08.600
All of which sets the stage for the single greatest
title sequence I have ever seen.

134
00:07:08.600 --> 00:07:09.900
I'm going to play it out in full,

135
00:07:09.900 --> 00:07:12.610
because I think the amount of
criticism and review that I'm about to do

136
00:07:12.610 --> 00:07:15.901
covers me for both US fair use
and the more strict UK fair dealing,

137
00:07:15.901 --> 00:07:18.627
but also because this deserves
to be seen in full.

138
00:07:18.627 --> 00:07:22.209
As a kid, watching this,
this was the first time that I can remember

139
00:07:22.209 --> 00:07:26.204
noticing the craft that went into making television,
and genuinely wondering...

140
00:07:26.204 --> 00:07:27.802
wait, how <i><b>was</b></i> that done?

141
00:07:27.802 --> 00:07:30.434
'Cause I couldn't go back and watch it again.
This was linear television.

142
00:07:30.434 --> 00:07:34.287
There was no pause or rewind unless
for some reason you'd bothered to tape it.

143
00:07:34.846 --> 00:07:37.550
Officially, the next show
was not "the ninth edition".

144
00:07:37.550 --> 00:07:39.100
There's no show number 9.

145
00:07:39.100 --> 00:07:41.713
Instead, they went to film on location,

146
00:07:41.713 --> 00:07:45.505
and they called the show
<i>It'll Be Alright On The Night's Cockup Trip.</i>

147
00:07:45.505 --> 00:07:49.467
<c.cyan><i>♪♪ [theme music begins]</i>

148
00:08:08.707 --> 00:08:13.185
<c.cyan><i>[applause]</i>

149
00:08:28.061 --> 00:08:29.507
<c.cyan><i>[music and applause end]</i>

150
00:08:29.507 --> 00:08:32.917
<c.yellow>Hello, from a hill in Cumbria
called Great Cockup.

151
00:08:32.917 --> 00:08:36.434
So. You may be asking,
what's so impressive about that?

152
00:08:36.434 --> 00:08:37.445
Well...

153
00:08:37.445 --> 00:08:40.741
First, we're coming in from a clip
in which a skier knocks over a camera

154
00:08:40.741 --> 00:08:42.745
and sends it rolling anti-clockwise.

155
00:08:42.745 --> 00:08:45.794
So we fade to a camera shot
that's also rolling anti-clockwise,

156
00:08:45.794 --> 00:08:47.471
which then lines up perfectly.

157
00:08:47.471 --> 00:08:49.394
Then the laser effect.

158
00:08:49.394 --> 00:08:52.413
Not tricky for a video artist in the 90s,
sure, but look:

159
00:08:52.413 --> 00:08:55.431
someone masked out the leaves
on that plant frame-by-frame,

160
00:08:55.431 --> 00:08:58.088
and someone's off-camera
making them move and react

161
00:08:58.088 --> 00:09:01.450
so it seems like the laser is
physically there, affecting things.

162
00:09:01.450 --> 00:09:04.257
Those leaves cast shadows
on the rest of the scene.

163
00:09:04.257 --> 00:09:08.276
This isn't just layers of photos composited,
it's real physical stuff.

164
00:09:08.276 --> 00:09:11.729
See the compass up at the top?
It swings wildly when the laser hits.

165
00:09:11.729 --> 00:09:13.677
It looks like it's affected by it.

166
00:09:13.677 --> 00:09:17.082
Completely unnecessary, no-one would have noticed
if that compass stayed still.

167
00:09:17.082 --> 00:09:18.787
It's not like the audience would have gone:

168
00:09:18.787 --> 00:09:23.583
"That's wrong, I thought compasses
reacted to nearby magical laser beams!"

169
00:09:23.583 --> 00:09:26.007
But still, they bothered to make that happen.

170
00:09:26.007 --> 00:09:29.218
And then, the map unfolds.
Okay, it's probably just some hidden wires,

171
00:09:29.218 --> 00:09:33.094
but anyone who's ever tried to fold and unfold
one of those massive Ordnance Survey maps

172
00:09:33.094 --> 00:09:36.713
knows what a pain in the ass that can be,
but they've rigged it to be smooth.

173
00:09:36.713 --> 00:09:41.140
And the map just clips the leaves as it opens,
proving that it's done for real.

174
00:09:41.140 --> 00:09:44.584
While that's happening, we get
this perfectly eased, smooth camera move,

175
00:09:44.584 --> 00:09:48.768
including what must be a focus pull,
to exactly the right point on the map.

176
00:09:48.768 --> 00:09:51.568
Second laser beam, more digital art,
which isn't too tricky,

177
00:09:51.568 --> 00:09:54.151
except it paints out
the contours on the map.

178
00:09:54.151 --> 00:09:57.749
Then, 3D animation.
Maybe a bit tricky, but this is 1996.

179
00:09:57.749 --> 00:10:01.454
Sci-fi shows like <i>Babylon 5</i>
were already doing full space battles in CG.

180
00:10:01.454 --> 00:10:04.052
Moving some contour lines around
is a pretty standard job.

181
00:10:04.052 --> 00:10:07.064
The flying-in text is very '90s,
but again, standard.

182
00:10:07.064 --> 00:10:10.157
But then... it's a helicopter shot!

183
00:10:10.157 --> 00:10:12.000
They hired a helicopter.

184
00:10:12.000 --> 00:10:14.550
Actually, they hired Castle Air
and pilot Michael Malric-Smith,

185
00:10:14.550 --> 00:10:17.597
who were well established as the go-to team
for aerial filming in the UK.

186
00:10:17.597 --> 00:10:19.535
And given there are no crew
around Denis Norden,

187
00:10:19.535 --> 00:10:22.675
they must have taken him by helicopter
to the top of the hill, then flown away,

188
00:10:22.675 --> 00:10:25.993
and then flown back in for that shot
however many times they needed to get it right.

189
00:10:25.993 --> 00:10:27.352
And what a shot!

190
00:10:27.352 --> 00:10:29.725
They hold on it for long enough that
they have to extend the theme tune,

191
00:10:29.725 --> 00:10:30.827
keep the drum loop going.

192
00:10:30.827 --> 00:10:33.603
And with the blue overlay at the top
and the changed speed of the footage,

193
00:10:33.603 --> 00:10:36.000
it almost looks computer-generated.

194
00:10:36.745 --> 00:10:39.512
They could have just hired an animator
for some regular titles

195
00:10:39.512 --> 00:10:41.330
and filmed in a studio,
same as usual.

196
00:10:41.330 --> 00:10:44.978
Or if they wanted an excuse to have a buzz around
in a helicopter on someone else's budget,

197
00:10:44.978 --> 00:10:48.147
they could have just used the single helicopter shot
and put some text over it.

198
00:10:48.147 --> 00:10:49.656
But they didn't.

199
00:10:49.656 --> 00:10:54.000
They used elaborate props and CG,
and they bothered to make a compass spin.

200
00:10:54.000 --> 00:10:58.344
Everything in that title sequence is so far
above and beyond the standards of the day.

201
00:10:58.344 --> 00:11:01.937
Yes, a few other shows had impressive,
painstakingly-made titles,

202
00:11:01.937 --> 00:11:04.402
but not for a one-off clip show.

203
00:11:04.402 --> 00:11:07.588
I have a vivid memory of
watching that as a kid.

204
00:11:07.588 --> 00:11:09.446
I didn't notice any of those fine details,
of course I didn't,

205
00:11:09.446 --> 00:11:11.759
but I remember being impressed
by the whole thing.

206
00:11:11.759 --> 00:11:15.657
And I think it's then that I really started
to understand for the first time

207
00:11:15.657 --> 00:11:19.123
that there are whole teams of people
who make the shows that we watch;

208
00:11:19.123 --> 00:11:22.445
that the way they do their job can be impressive,
they can go above and beyond;

209
00:11:22.445 --> 00:11:25.766
and that... well,
maybe I could do that too one day.

210
00:11:25.766 --> 00:11:30.540
And I reckon that that show was the peak,
the decadent height of old-school TV.

211
00:11:30.540 --> 00:11:32.401
When the <i>Cockup Trip</i> was aired in '96,

212
00:11:32.401 --> 00:11:35.267
very few people questioned
the dominance of television,

213
00:11:35.267 --> 00:11:38.835
and the standard big broadcaster model
that had been stable for decades. 

214
00:11:38.835 --> 00:11:41.778
It was all about to change,
but right then,

215
00:11:41.778 --> 00:11:44.977
even a clip show could spend money on
elaborate titles and helicopters,

216
00:11:44.977 --> 00:11:48.161
because with more than
ten million people watching,

217
00:11:48.161 --> 00:11:50.979
they would still make a lot of profit
from advertising.

218
00:11:50.979 --> 00:11:53.358
As for how that all fell apart?

219
00:11:53.358 --> 00:11:55.650
Well… I'll tell you after the break.

220
00:12:00.000 --> 00:12:03.539
The future might have seemed bright
for television in 1996,

221
00:12:03.539 --> 00:12:06.852
but the first signs of the changes to come
were already there,

222
00:12:06.852 --> 00:12:08.176
if you knew where to look.

223
00:12:08.176 --> 00:12:10.698
Cable and satellite TV were starting
to reach the mass market,

224
00:12:10.698 --> 00:12:13.571
and there were a few more channels
available to a few people.

225
00:12:13.571 --> 00:12:17.208
And this new thing called the World Wide Web
was starting to get some attention,

226
00:12:17.208 --> 00:12:20.479
even though so far it was mostly
just a toy for a few nerds.

227
00:12:20.479 --> 00:12:23.808
But unless you were in the media industry
and really forward-thinking,

228
00:12:23.808 --> 00:12:26.936
television and the big broadcasters
were the kings.

229
00:12:26.936 --> 00:12:31.135
And to the public, it certainly <i><b>looked like</b></i>
there weren't any pretenders to the throne.

230
00:12:31.135 --> 00:12:34.512
In the ten years that followed:
<i>Big Brother</i> kicked off reality TV,

231
00:12:34.512 --> 00:12:37.613
hundreds of channels of digital television launched,
broadband internet rolled out,

232
00:12:37.613 --> 00:12:41.057
almost everyone bought a mobile phone,
Facebook and Twitter launched,

233
00:12:41.057 --> 00:12:43.429
video editing on home computers
became possible,

234
00:12:43.429 --> 00:12:48.000
and the first clips were uploaded
to a small website called YouTube.

235
00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:52.164
The years from 1996 to 2006
were the fastest acceleration

236
00:12:52.164 --> 00:12:54.755
that the media industry had ever seen.

237
00:12:54.755 --> 00:12:57.097
And you can see that change
in <i>Alright on the Night.</i>

238
00:12:57.097 --> 00:12:59.250
Denis Norden continued presenting
for those ten years,

239
00:12:59.250 --> 00:13:01.822
until poor eyesight eventually
forced him to retire.

240
00:13:01.822 --> 00:13:05.384
In the episodes that followed,
the show was still at a high standard, of course,

241
00:13:05.384 --> 00:13:07.834
but the introductions became standard
animated affairs again,

242
00:13:07.834 --> 00:13:11.145
and after a brief dalliance with
2D animation and stop-motion,

243
00:13:11.145 --> 00:13:13.987
they went down the same CG route
as every other show.

244
00:13:13.987 --> 00:13:17.502
Although fair play, the 21st-anniversary special
was recorded on a yacht...

245
00:13:17.502 --> 00:13:21.259
albeit with a much less impressive set of titles,
no credit for aerial camerawork,

246
00:13:21.259 --> 00:13:24.580
and Denis Norden being suspiciously
not visible in the aerial shots.

247
00:13:24.580 --> 00:13:28.305
Again, I'm not saying they just
went to the seaside, hired a small boat,

248
00:13:28.305 --> 00:13:31.235
and then used stock footage of
a big expensive yacht for the aerials,

249
00:13:31.235 --> 00:13:35.199
but I am saying that directors always
like to show off... if they can.

250
00:13:35.199 --> 00:13:36.568
<c.yellow>Don't ask me.

251
00:13:36.568 --> 00:13:39.089
So Denis Norden retired,
but the show continued.

252
00:13:39.089 --> 00:13:41.963
Griff Rhys Jones took over as presenter,
in much the same style.

253
00:13:41.963 --> 00:13:43.539
He presented from '08 to '16,

254
00:13:43.539 --> 00:13:47.212
with the sort of standard CG titles
you'd expect from a regular studio show,

255
00:13:47.212 --> 00:13:50.937
and shortened, faster title music
with some fiddly bits added.

256
00:13:50.937 --> 00:13:54.193
And even now, in 2020,
the show limps on,

257
00:13:54.193 --> 00:13:56.639
with David Walliams narrating
just as a voiceover.

258
00:13:56.639 --> 00:13:58.261
No cameras anymore, no studio.

259
00:13:58.261 --> 00:14:01.361
it's just a compilation clip show,
with regular animated titles,

260
00:14:01.361 --> 00:14:04.738
and the music has
even more fiddly bits added.

261
00:14:04.738 --> 00:14:07.526
<c.cyan><i>♪♪ [theme music coda]</i>

262
00:14:07.526 --> 00:14:11.494
I'm not meaning to cast aspersions
on the creative teams who've made those titles.

263
00:14:11.494 --> 00:14:14.387
They're perfectly good titles,
they haven't cut corners.

264
00:14:14.387 --> 00:14:17.981
But they also haven't made
an actual, physical compass needle spin

265
00:14:17.981 --> 00:14:22.553
for no reason other than it'll make the show
look very, very slightly more impressive

266
00:14:22.553 --> 00:14:23.929
for the few people who notice it.

267
00:14:23.929 --> 00:14:28.053
No-one's asked them to do that.
And no channel has the money or time for it.

268
00:14:28.053 --> 00:14:30.000
Because the show's ratings are...

269
00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:32.955
well, they're going the same way as
everything else on television.

270
00:14:32.955 --> 00:14:35.471
Don't get me wrong, I don't think
TV's going to die entirely —

271
00:14:35.471 --> 00:14:37.206
radio's still going, after all.

272
00:14:37.206 --> 00:14:40.055
I think TV is still going to be an important
part of culture for a long while.

273
00:14:40.055 --> 00:14:46.352
But the days of seventeen million people
watching an outtakes show are long past.

274
00:14:46.831 --> 00:14:49.776
Denis Norden died in 2018,
at 96 years old.

275
00:14:49.776 --> 00:14:54.000
His memoirs include a story about being in
a landing craft in Normandy on D-Day,

276
00:14:54.000 --> 00:14:55.686
and also a reference to Google.

277
00:14:55.686 --> 00:14:57.139
He wrote of him and his peers:

278
00:14:57.139 --> 00:15:00.992
"We not only lived through the golden age
of so many forms of popular entertainment.

279
00:15:00.992 --> 00:15:04.373
"We were present at the birth of many of them,
enjoyed their heyday,

280
00:15:04.373 --> 00:15:06.480
"and we were there
to mourn their passing."

281
00:15:07.438 --> 00:15:11.050
I wasn't there for the birth of television, obviously,
but I was there for its heyday, and...

282
00:15:11.050 --> 00:15:13.597
Sitting there, as a kid in 1996,
watching the screen,

283
00:15:13.597 --> 00:15:17.413
I had no idea how much
everything was about to change.

284
00:15:17.413 --> 00:15:21.036
And we're here now, watching online video
on a phone, or a computer,

285
00:15:21.036 --> 00:15:24.273
or maybe what we still call
the big screen on the wall, the TV.

286
00:15:24.273 --> 00:15:26.550
How long will it be until
the next big change comes along,

287
00:15:26.550 --> 00:15:29.786
and a whole new medium arrives
to outcompete... <i><b>this?</b></i>

288
00:15:29.786 --> 00:15:31.666
Because sooner or later,
that will happen.

289
00:15:31.666 --> 00:15:34.415
All the people and companies out there,
including me,

290
00:15:34.415 --> 00:15:37.892
everyone who's spending money to make
big, expensive, impressive videos:

291
00:15:37.892 --> 00:15:40.487
Enjoy it, by all means, but...

292
00:15:40.487 --> 00:15:44.659
it's worth keeping an eye on the horizon and
planning for whatever might come next.

293
00:15:44.659 --> 00:15:47.290
That's the lesson to take from the <i>Cockup Trip</i>
now as an adult,

294
00:15:47.290 --> 00:15:51.049
but as a kid watching back in '96, well...

295
00:15:51.049 --> 00:15:54.852
First, I learned that anything you say or do on camera
can and will come back to haunt you.

296
00:15:54.852 --> 00:15:57.282
But more than that:
I learned that sometimes,

297
00:15:57.282 --> 00:16:00.352
it's worth doing things for your craft
just because you can. 

298
00:16:00.352 --> 00:16:03.133
That sometimes it's worth going above and beyond,
and sweating the small stuff,

299
00:16:03.133 --> 00:16:06.132
because someone else will notice
what you've done.

300
00:16:06.132 --> 00:16:08.456
When I add a little easter egg
in the background of a video;

301
00:16:08.456 --> 00:16:12.929
when I tweak a graphic to fix something that
only a couple of people would ever notice;

302
00:16:12.929 --> 00:16:18.085
or when I go and spend hours in a library
fact-checking and looking up obscure references:

303
00:16:18.085 --> 00:16:21.371
that title sequence is the sort of thing
that inspired me.

304
00:16:21.371 --> 00:16:25.275
It taught me that while you don't have to
strive for absolute perfection,

305
00:16:25.275 --> 00:16:28.027
sometimes it's worth taking
a little bit of time and effort

306
00:16:28.027 --> 00:16:30.228
to make something you're really proud of.

322
00:16:30.228 --> 00:16:33.524
I didn't need to travel to the Lake District
to make this video.

308
00:16:33.524 --> 00:16:36.144
I didn't need to climb this hill
called Great Cockup,

309
00:16:36.144 --> 00:16:39.788
or hire a drone operator so I can end this video
the same way as <i>Cockup Trip</i> ended,

310
00:16:39.788 --> 00:16:41.785
with a spectacular final aerial shot.

311
00:16:41.785 --> 00:16:44.899
I didn't need to commission
a saxophone-heavy, very 90s,

312
00:16:44.899 --> 00:16:49.146
but legally-distinct for copyright purposes,
theme tune to end this video on.

313
00:16:49.146 --> 00:16:50.444
But I did.

314
00:16:50.444 --> 00:16:53.288
And that's partly because I want to pay tribute
to the folks that came before me.

315
00:16:53.288 --> 00:16:55.993
Partly because I want to show off
while I can.

316
00:16:55.993 --> 00:16:59.262
And it's partly because,
nearly 25 years ago,

317
00:16:59.262 --> 00:17:02.328
someone bothered to make a compass needle spin.

318
00:17:02.328 --> 00:17:05.117
So, I say this unironically:

319
00:17:05.117 --> 00:17:06.945
Merry Christmas, Denis Norden.

320
00:17:06.945 --> 00:17:10.001
<c.cyan><i>♪♪ [legally-distinct theme tune]</i>

321
00:17:11.145 --> 00:16:30.228
<c.cyan><i>[Caption+ by JS*
https://caption.plus]</i>

322
00:16:30.228 --> 00:16:33.524
I didn't need to travel to the Lake District
to make this video.

323
00:17:36.723 --> 00:17:38.095
<c.yellow>Outtake!

324
00:17:39.212 --> 00:17:40.845
You okay?
<c.yellow>Yeah!

325
00:17:40.845 --> 00:17:42.892
That was —
I'll be honest, I'm —

326
00:17:42.892 --> 00:17:45.465
I'm genuinely annoyed that's not a 360 camera,
and didn't have a back shot.

327
00:17:45.465 --> 00:17:48.383
'Cause that was so graceful!
That was lovely!

328
00:17:48.383 --> 00:17:50.660
You know that's gonna be
the outtake at the end now.

