WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.168
Great idea, Tom. Film in front of Parliament.

2
00:00:02.168 --> 00:00:04.335
It's imposing. It's relevant to the story.
It'll look great.

3
00:00:04.335 --> 00:00:06.240
It is covered in scaffolding.

4
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:09.060
When you buy a tape measure,&nbsp;
that tape measure had to be&nbsp;&nbsp;

5
00:00:09.060 --> 00:00:11.850
checked and calibrated with&nbsp;equipment
at the tape measure factory.

6
00:00:11.850 --> 00:00:14.160
And that manufacturing equipment
had to be calibrated

7
00:00:14.160 --> 00:00:16.980
by other calibration&nbsp;equipment
at its factory.

8
00:00:16.980 --> 00:00:19.888
And that equipment had to be&nbsp;calibrated,
and so on, and so on, and so on,

9
00:00:19.890 --> 00:00:22.635
until at some point,&nbsp;
that chain has to stop,

10
00:00:22.635 --> 00:00:24.930
there has to be an&nbsp;organisation
whose job it is to say:

11
00:00:24.930 --> 00:00:28.623
"you don't need to calibrate any&nbsp;
more. Here is the truth."

12
00:00:28.623 --> 00:00:31.350
These days, that job's done at the
National&nbsp; Physical Laboratory in the UK,

13
00:00:31.350 --> 00:00:34.020
or the National Institute of&nbsp;
Standards and Technology in the US.

14
00:00:34.020 --> 00:00:36.775
I've actually been lucky enough
to visit both of those in the past,

15
00:00:36.780 --> 00:00:38.850
so I'll put links to those&nbsp;
videos at the end of this one.

16
00:00:38.850 --> 00:00:42.060
The international standard&nbsp;
for length is the meter,

17
00:00:42.060 --> 00:00:46.080
and it's based on unchanging&nbsp;
physical constants:

18
00:00:46.080 --> 00:00:49.800
a meter is defined as how far&nbsp;
light travels in a vacuum in&nbsp;&nbsp;

19
00:00:49.800 --> 00:00:51.180
a certain fraction of a second.

20
00:00:51.180 --> 00:00:54.095
Is that all in frame? I've got no idea.
I can't see my screen.

21
00:00:54.095 --> 00:00:55.530
But anyway, ever since the mid-20th century,

22
00:00:55.530 --> 00:01:00.390
the international agreement&nbsp;has been that
an inch is&nbsp;exactly 25.4 millimetres.

23
00:01:00.390 --> 00:01:03.360
Which means yes, the US and imperial&nbsp;
systems of measurement,

24
00:01:03.360 --> 00:01:06.870
inches, feet, yards, miles:
they're all based&nbsp;on metric now.

25
00:01:06.870 --> 00:01:09.180
But before all those&nbsp;
modern standards were set,

26
00:01:09.180 --> 00:01:12.030
those systems of measurement&nbsp;
were based on prototypes.

27
00:01:12.030 --> 00:01:14.490
Not 'prototypes' as in&nbsp;
'early test versions',

28
00:01:14.490 --> 00:01:17.490
but as in physical artifacts&nbsp;
which were, by definition,

29
00:01:17.490 --> 00:01:19.410
the length they said they were.

30
00:01:19.410 --> 00:01:22.110
"The metre" was the distance&nbsp;
between two marks on a&nbsp;&nbsp;

31
00:01:22.110 --> 00:01:24.210
platinum-iridium bar stored in Paris.

32
00:01:24.240 --> 00:01:26.250
If those marks somehow changed,

33
00:01:26.250 --> 00:01:29.340
then the definition of the&nbsp;
metre changed with them.

34
00:01:29.340 --> 00:01:32.310
Before we went metric, Britain&nbsp;
had physical standards for the&nbsp;&nbsp;

35
00:01:32.310 --> 00:01:34.410
old imperial units, too,&nbsp;
dating back centuries.

36
00:01:34.410 --> 00:01:37.320
There are references to various&nbsp;
standards all through history,&nbsp;&nbsp;

37
00:01:37.320 --> 00:01:38.670
but as far as I could tell,

38
00:01:38.730 --> 00:01:43.238
the first prototype that could&nbsp;reasonably
be called a British national standard

39
00:01:43.238 --> 00:01:46.620
was a brass&nbsp;rod that was created in 1760.

40
00:01:46.620 --> 00:01:50.130
That standard was eventually&nbsp;
set in law: in 1825, the yard,

41
00:01:50.130 --> 00:01:52.590
so three feet, 36 inches, was defined&nbsp;&nbsp;

42
00:01:52.590 --> 00:01:55.590
as being the distance between&nbsp;
the marks on that one object,

43
00:01:55.590 --> 00:01:58.950
stored with the Clerk of the&nbsp;
House of Commons, in Parliament.

44
00:01:58.950 --> 00:02:03.009
Nine years after that law was&nbsp;passed...
Parliament burned down.

45
00:02:03.009 --> 00:02:05.409
They were trying to burn old records&nbsp;
that were on wooden "tally-sticks",

46
00:02:05.430 --> 00:02:06.900
and the fire got out of control.

47
00:02:06.900 --> 00:02:10.055
That famous Parliament building,
the one that's behind the scaffolding,

48
00:02:10.055 --> 00:02:12.480
it isn't some ancient castle: heck,

49
00:02:12.480 --> 00:02:15.360
the US Capitol Building is&nbsp;
older than what's behind there.

50
00:02:15.360 --> 00:02:17.850
Only a few parts from medieval&nbsp;
times are still standing:

51
00:02:17.850 --> 00:02:20.850
the rest was built during Queen&nbsp;
Victoria's reign, after the fire.

52
00:02:20.850 --> 00:02:23.250
Anyway, all the standards&nbsp;
for imperial units

53
00:02:23.250 --> 00:02:25.170
were also destroyed in that fire.

54
00:02:25.170 --> 00:02:28.350
The ‘standard Yard’&nbsp;
had been partly melted.

55
00:02:28.350 --> 00:02:32.040
Which meant Britain didn't have&nbsp;
any legal standard of measurement.

56
00:02:32.040 --> 00:02:34.980
But that was fine! Because&nbsp;
the law also had a provision&nbsp;&nbsp;

57
00:02:34.980 --> 00:02:38.040
for what to do in that case:&nbsp;
you make a new Standard Yard,

58
00:02:38.040 --> 00:02:42.690
defined by the length of a pendulum that&nbsp;
takes a certain amount of time to swing.

59
00:02:42.690 --> 00:02:44.880
Great idea. More than a century early,

60
00:02:44.880 --> 00:02:49.500
they were defining the measurements by&nbsp;
physical constants! Just one problem:

61
00:02:49.500 --> 00:02:52.020
those definitions were wrong.&nbsp;
Or as the law later put it,

62
00:02:52.020 --> 00:02:55.650
"by the Researches of scientific Men&nbsp;
Doubts were thrown on the Accuracy".

63
00:02:55.650 --> 00:02:58.800
Those Scientific Men were&nbsp;
the Standards Commission,

64
00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:01.110
headed by Astronomer and&nbsp;
Mathematician Sir George Airy.

65
00:03:01.110 --> 00:03:04.770
That commission was in charge of&nbsp;
re-establishing the lost units,

66
00:03:04.770 --> 00:03:06.600
and their final report made it clear:

67
00:03:06.600 --> 00:03:09.900
the government had put a&nbsp;
dodgy experiment into law.

68
00:03:09.900 --> 00:03:12.030
It wasn't accurate enough. So instead,

69
00:03:12.090 --> 00:03:14.670
the standard was reconstructed&nbsp;
based on all the copies and&nbsp;&nbsp;

70
00:03:14.670 --> 00:03:16.890
other versions that had&nbsp;
been made over all the years,

71
00:03:16.890 --> 00:03:19.675
all the objects, not like tape measures,
or anything like that, but

72
00:03:19.675 --> 00:03:23.025
the things that were one step&nbsp;
down that chain of calibration.

73
00:03:23.040 --> 00:03:25.950
So by 1855, a new physical yard had&nbsp;
been constructed, made of bronze,

74
00:03:25.950 --> 00:03:28.560
and the law was changed&nbsp;
to define the idea of a&nbsp;&nbsp;

75
00:03:28.560 --> 00:03:32.160
"yard" as the distance between&nbsp;
two gold studs on that new bar.

76
00:03:32.160 --> 00:03:34.770
There were a few other suggestions&nbsp;
in the commission's report:

77
00:03:34.770 --> 00:03:38.820
they strongly argued for&nbsp;the
decimalisation of units and currency,

78
00:03:38.820 --> 00:03:41.296
which wasn't successful for a century.

79
00:03:41.310 --> 00:03:44.040
But they also said that there&nbsp;should be
a public version of&nbsp;the standards

80
00:03:44.040 --> 00:03:45.570
in every large town:

81
00:03:45.570 --> 00:03:47.490
not because they'd be&nbsp;
perfectly accurate,

82
00:03:47.490 --> 00:03:49.997
but because it would make it
really really obvious

83
00:03:50.010 --> 00:03:53.670
if a shopkeeper with a dodgy tape&nbsp;
measure was trying to cheat you.

84
00:03:53.670 --> 00:03:57.240
Those standards still exist&nbsp;
in a few places. In London,

85
00:03:57.240 --> 00:04:00.120
you can find them in Trafalgar&nbsp;Square,
in the Guildhall,

86
00:04:00.120 --> 00:04:02.100
and by the gate of&nbsp;
the Royal Observatory.

87
00:04:02.100 --> 00:04:07.410
So if you have bought lunch from, let's say,
a&nbsp;certain shop and want to check if

88
00:04:07.410 --> 00:04:11.490
your "footlong sandwich" really&nbsp;
is a foot long, you can do that.

89
00:04:11.490 --> 00:04:12.750
And I did.

90
00:04:12.750 --> 00:04:15.960
So: was the new yard the same&nbsp;
distance as the old one? Well,

91
00:04:15.960 --> 00:04:17.520
it would be difficult to&nbsp;
mess it up too much,

92
00:04:17.520 --> 00:04:19.650
there were a lot of copies&nbsp;
of the original to work from.

93
00:04:19.650 --> 00:04:22.620
But every time you make an&nbsp;
analogue copy of something,

94
00:04:22.620 --> 00:04:24.450
you do lose a little bit of precision.

95
00:04:24.450 --> 00:04:28.800
Before the 1834 fire, the yard was the&nbsp;
length of one particular block of metal;

96
00:04:28.830 --> 00:04:32.040
after 1855, it was the length of&nbsp;
another block. In between: well,

97
00:04:32.040 --> 00:04:33.750
you could take a pretty accurate guess,

98
00:04:33.750 --> 00:04:36.330
but that chain of calibration,&nbsp;
that source of truth,

99
00:04:36.330 --> 00:04:38.760
was broken. For twenty-one years:

100
00:04:38.940 --> 00:04:44.070
no-one knew how long a yard,
a foot, or an inch actually was.

